THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TSUYOSHI MASUMOTO, AKIHISA INOUE, NOBUYUKI NISHIYAMA,
HIROYUKI HORIMURA AND TOSHISUKE SHIBATA
____________
Appeal No. 96-2056
Application No. 08/210,1391
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GRON, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 11 through 14, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed March 17, 1994. According
to applicants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/885,480, filed May 19, 1992, now U.S. Patent
5,324,368, issued June 28, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007