Ex parte ZAHER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2061                                                           
          Application No. 08/152,080                                                   

          Arai                     4,399,749                 Aug. 23, 1983             
          Haigh et al.        4,465,728                 Aug. 14, 1984                  
          (Haigh)                                                                      

          Kawasaki et al.     4,555,427                 Nov. 26, 1985                  
          (Kawasaki)                                                                   
          Fukui               4,820,310                 Apr. 11, 1989                  
          Fuchs (Germany)     3,904,424                 Jan. 18, 1990                  
          (translation copy attached)                                                  
               Claims 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Fuchs in view of Haigh and Arai.                  
          Claims 16 through 18 stand correspondingly rejected over these               
          references in various combinations with the other above listed               
          references relied upon by the examiner.                                      
               We refer to the brief and to the answer for a complete                  
          exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by the                       
          appellant and the examiner concerning the above noted                        
          rejections.                                                                  
                                       OPINION                                         
               We will not sustain any of the rejections advanced by the               
          examiner on this appeal.                                                     
               We are in substantial agreement with the basic position                 
          advocated by the appellant that the applied references in                    

                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007