THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JEROME L. SHEN, BALAGTAS F. GUEVARA and
FRANK E. SPADAFORA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2149
Application 08/135,2071
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-15, all the claims in the present
application. Claims 1 and 7 are illustrative:
1. A process for producing an isoflavone enriched protein isolate comprising:
1Application for patent filed October 12, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007