THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte SCOTT B. BEIER
and REX A. ADAMS
______________
Appeal No. 96-2178
Application 08/146,9011
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 1 through 21.2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we
cannot sustain any of the grounds of rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 12 through 17 under 35 U.S.C.
1Application for patent filed October 20, 1993.
2Amendment of August 22, 1994 (Paper No. 7).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007