Appeal No. 96-2185
Application 08/205,281
et al. by performing some of the work on the circuit framework subsequent to the molding step as
suggested by Uda. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp.,
837 F.2d 1044, 1050-54, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438-41 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825
(1988).
Thus, it is manifest that the only direction to appellants’ claimed invention as a whole on the
record before us is supplied by appellants’ own specification.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
Reversed
ANDREW H. METZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007