Appeal No. 96-2189
Application 07/969,731
confirm the entry of the function to be accessed and twelve
LEDs 15 to indicate the reason for the trip operation.
However, Yalla fails to teach a user interface panel
presenting a visual protection curve representation of the
adjustable predetermined function as well as indicator means
associated with the visual protection curve having a first
state in response to a trip and a second state in response to
adjusting through an input means. Yalla teaches in contrast
that the operator must view a screen 41 to scroll through a
program menu to display the functions indicated by LED 71 and
their set points ranges, and to enter a set point indicated by
LED 72 which defines the operational limits of the tripping
and reconnect functions. Thus, LEDs 71 and 72 are not
associated with a visual protection curve representation or an
indicator means for displaying a trip signal.
Therefore, we fail to find that the Examiner has shown
that the prior art suggested the desirability of the modifying
the Matsko user interface panel presenting a visual protection
curve representation 42, 47, 48a having LED indicators 140-143
merely having a first state to a user interface panel having
11
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007