THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte OLAN S. FRUCHEY, EDWARD G. ZEY
and LARRY O. WHEELER
_________
Appeal No. 96-2335
1
Application 08/213,375
_________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before DOWNEY, METZ and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8. Claims 9 through 14, pending in the application, stand withdrawn by the
1 Application for patent filed March 15, 1994. According to the appellants,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/957,465, filed October 6, 1992,
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/608,106, filed November
1, 1990, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007