Appeal No. 96-2444 Application 08/360,194 in the art and to have further used the only button provided by the Carter reference" (Paper No. 4, page 4). This is a mere conclusion and, further, the button in Carter is only actuable by the user. The examiner also states that "clearly it would have been obvious to those skilled in the art to use the switch [for switching back and forth between the normal and standby modes] in the same manner as one would use a refrigerator sensor [which is actuated by closing the refrigerator door]" (EA4), which indirectly addresses a switch actuable by a user's digit and by closing the case. The examiner further states (EA8): Though the art of record fails to detail a single switch that sensed not only the case cover's position and a user's finger, it would have been obvious to those skilled in the art to implement one switch by integrating the function of many into one. No art has been applied to support the examiner's conclusion. While it seems like a simple modification to combine the functions of two prior art switches, one which is actuated by a user's digit to switch between a normal and standby mode and one which is actuated by case closure to enter a sleep mode, into a single switch which is actuated both by a user's digit and by closure of the case, the single switch for multiple - 9 -Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007