THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARTHUR E. BOGDEN and
JACQUES-PIERRE MOREAU
____________
Appeal No. 96-2471
Application No. 08/089,4101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final
rejection of claims 6 to 11, 16, 18, and 19 (Notice of Appeal,
Paper 28).
Application 08/089,410, filed 9 July 1993, which is said to be a1
continuation of Application 07/652,863, filed 8 February 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007