Ex parte BOGDEN et al. - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                      
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                       
             for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                             
             Board.                                                                                               




                                                                                    Paper No. 37                  
                                UNITED STATES BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                ____________                                                      
                                    Ex parte ARTHUR E. BOGDEN and                                                 
                                          JACQUES-PIERRE MOREAU                                                   
                                                ____________                                                      
                                            Appeal No. 96-2471                                                    
                                       Application No. 08/089,4101                                                
                                                ____________                                                      
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                ____________                                                      
             Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                           
             Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                            
             McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    Appellants seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final                                     
             rejection of claims 6 to 11, 16, 18, and 19 (Notice of Appeal,                                       
             Paper 28).                                                                                           



              Application 08/089,410, filed 9 July 1993, which is said to be a1                                                                                             
             continuation of Application 07/652,863, filed 8 February 1991.                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007