Ex parte YAMAMOTO et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2497                                         Page 3           
          Application No. 08/314,788                                                  


          corresponding to the position of a chin of the facial image and             
          a second mark at a position corresponding to the position of a              
          crown of a head of the facial image;                                        
               an adjusting device for adjusting a magnification of an                
          image in accordance with the face size detected by said                     
          detection device, so as to cause said facial image to have a                
          predetermined size in said photograph;                                      
               a recording device for recording said facial image onto a              
          recording medium at said magnification; and                                 
               a processing device for processing said recording medium               
          having said facial image recorded thereon so as to produce said             
          photograph.                                                                 

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Yamamoto et al. (Yamamoto)         4,903,057           Feb. 20,             
          1990                                                                        
          Thayer, Jr.                        4,959,670           Sep. 25,             
          1990                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 7, 11-15, 17, 22 through 25, 34 and 35                
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over                     
          Yamamoto in view of Thayer.                                                 


               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the                      
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        


                                       OPINION                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007