Ex parte AMES et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-2498                                         Page 4           
          Application No. 08/250,139                                                  


               Independent claims 1 and 17 recite “at least one                       
          communication protocol interconnect module coupled to said                  
          simulator and wherein said simulator configures said                        
          communication protocol interconnect module...”  This is a very              
          important limitation in the claims since this is what allows                
          for rapid reconfiguration for different test conditions                     
          occurring during aircraft development.                                      
               The examiner recognizes the deficiency in Berner in not                
          disclosing or suggesting this claim limitation yet the examiner             
          incredibly takes the position [bottom of page 20-answer] that               
          the “claims do not explicitly state that the communication                  
          protocol interconnect module be configured by the simulator.”               
          Independent claims 1 and 17 clearly do explicitly require the               
          protocol interconnect module to be coupled to the simulator and             
          configured thereby.  [See line 20 of these claims].                         
          Accordingly, since the examiner has ignored a key limitation of             
          the claims, either intentionally or unintentionally, no prima               
          facie case of obviousness has been established with regard to               












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007