Appeal No. 96-2498 Page 4 Application No. 08/250,139 Independent claims 1 and 17 recite “at least one communication protocol interconnect module coupled to said simulator and wherein said simulator configures said communication protocol interconnect module...” This is a very important limitation in the claims since this is what allows for rapid reconfiguration for different test conditions occurring during aircraft development. The examiner recognizes the deficiency in Berner in not disclosing or suggesting this claim limitation yet the examiner incredibly takes the position [bottom of page 20-answer] that the “claims do not explicitly state that the communication protocol interconnect module be configured by the simulator.” Independent claims 1 and 17 clearly do explicitly require the protocol interconnect module to be coupled to the simulator and configured thereby. [See line 20 of these claims]. Accordingly, since the examiner has ignored a key limitation of the claims, either intentionally or unintentionally, no prima facie case of obviousness has been established with regard toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007