Ex parte YOSHIDA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2593                                                           
          Application No. 08/119,075                                                   


          6-11 and 14-20, all the claims remaining in the present                      
          application.  Claims 1 and 20 are illustrative:                              
               1.  A thermoplastic polyester lamination structure                      
          comprising 1) at least one layer of a thermoplastic polyester                
          (A) prepared from i) an acid component mainly comprising an                  
          aromatic dicarboxylic acid and a glycol component mainly                     
          comprising an aliphatic glycol and ii) 2-type aluminum oxide                 
          particles (B) and 2) at least one layer of another                           
          thermoplastic polyester laminated to said layer of a                         
          thermoplastic polyester (A).                                                 
               20. A thermoplastic polyester lamination structure                      
          comprising at least one layer of a thermoplastic polyester (A)               
          prepared from i) an acid component mainly comprising an                      
          aromatic dicarboxylic acid and a glycol component mainly                     
          comprising an aliphatic glycol and (ii) 2-type aluminum oxide                
          particles (B), said particles having an acicular or platy                    
          shape.                                                                       
               The examiner relies upon the following reference as                     
          evidence of obviousness:                                                     
          Murooka et al. (Murooka)            5,252,388        Oct. 12, 1993           
                                                       (filed Dec. 13, 1991)           
               Appealed claims 1-4, 6-11 and 14-20 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Murooka.                          
               Upon careful consideration of the opposing arguments                    
          presented on appeal, we find that the examiner has failed to                 
          establish a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed                  
          subject matter.  Accordingly, we will not sustain the                        
          examiner's rejection.                                                        

                                         -2-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007