Appeal No. 96-2614
Application 08/098,740
We do not express a view one way or another with respect
to the arguments of the appellant as directed to certain
dependent claims, which we have not specifically addressed
above.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 5 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the appellant’s admitted prior art as
depicted in Figure 1 of the specification, in view of Carroll.
is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1-3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12-20,
21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007