Appeal No. 96-2616
Application 08/280,271
The reference to Wroblewski, applied in the rejection of claim 5, is not seen to remedy the
deficiencies of APS and Inoue.
We find that the examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness with regard
to the instant claimed subject matter and, accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1
through 5 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007