Appeal No. 1996-2624
Application No. 08/186,352
(1) claims 1, 3 through 5, 14 through 16 and 20 through
22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Bosse in view of Katori;
(2) claims 1, 3 through 6, 14 through 16 and 20 through
22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Bosse in view of Ring;
(3) claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bosse in view of Ring, as applied
to claim 1, and further in view of Langford;
(4) claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bosse in view of Katori, as applied
to claim 1, or Bosse in view of Ring, as applied to claim 1,
and further in view of Eschler;
(5) claims 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Bosse in view of Katori, as
applied to claim 1, or Bosse in view of Ring, as applied to
claim 1, and further in view of Radzins; and
(6) claims 17 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Bosse in view of Ring in
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007