Ex parte KAKUTANI - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                             Paper No. 45                             

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                             Ex parte MASAYOSHI KAKUTANI                              
                                  ________________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 96-2651                                   
                               Application 08/201,4791                                
                                  ________________                                    
                                 HEARD:  MAY 7, 1998                                  
                                  ________________                                    
          Before STONER, Chief Administrative Judge,                                  
          COHEN and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                              ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                
               This is in response to a "REQUEST FOR REHEARING"                       
          (hereafter "request") of our decision dated May 28, 1998,                   
          wherein this panel of the board reversed the examiner's                     

               Application for patent filed February 23, 1994.1                                                                     
          According to appellant, the application is a continuation of                
          Application 07/915,419, filed July 17, 1992, now abandoned.                 
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007