THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TRAVIS W. HONEYCUTT
__________
Appeal No. 96-2675
Application 08/299,7601
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed September 1, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/055,083, filed April 29, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/881,685,
filed May 12, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,207,837; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/683,290, filed April
10, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007