Appeal No. 96-2742 Application No. 08/311,371 In summary, the admitted prior art does not disclose or suggest any electrical signals from the carrier to the recording and reproducing unit, and more specifically does not suggest direct signals without use of the director. Kuo does not disclose or suggest adding communication between the carrier and the recording and reproducing unit, and particularly does not suggest a direct communication between the two. Therefore, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, as the combination does not include all of the limitations recited in the claims. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007