Appeal No. 96-2745
Application No. 08/114,979
IBM. Claims 10 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Sharp in view of Norwood, IBM and
WordPerfect. Claims 14 and 21 through 23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sharp in view of
Norwood, IBM and AgentDA. Claims 17 and 20 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sharp in view
of IBM and Griffin.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants
and
the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful review of the evidence before us, we
will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12,
14, 17 and 20 through 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The Examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie
case. It is the burden of the Examiner to establish why one
having ordinary skill in the art would have been led to the
-4-4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007