Appeal No. 96-2752
Application 08/224,202
It is further considered that even if there were motivation to combine the teachings in
the art relied on by the examiner, the combination would not result in the claimed invention. It has not
been established by the examiner that the combination would include (1) interchangeable character
displays, as recited in independent claims 1, 22 and 23, (2) an interconnect cable which is hard-wired
with the unique character address of its associated logic circuit, as in claim 23 and dependent claim 20,
(3) a controller to produce the equivalent of a set signal containing set address data for identifying an
addressed set of signal elements, as recited in
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007