THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ELAINE S. YAMAGUCHI
__________
Appeal No. 96-2768
Application 08/118,3771
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the primary examiner's final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4 and 5. Claim 6, which is the only remaining pending claim in the application, has been
indicated by the primary examiner as being allowable. We affirm.
Application for patent filed September 8, 1993.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007