THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JEAN-LOUIS G. GHEYSENS, WILLIAM J. WELLS, III
and RICHARD E. WOODLING
__________
Appeal No. 96-2808
Application 08/102,7081
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
21-26, 29-31, 38 and 39, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We affirm-in-part and
we enter a new ground of rejection pursuant to the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
1Application for patent filed August 5, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/832,745, filed February 7, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007