Ex parte FUJIMORI - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1996-2822                                                        
          Application 08/153,916                                                      



          movement vector is supplied to   an input 4a of the system                  
          controller 4 of Figure 1.                                                   
                    Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                     
                    1.  An image movement vector detection apparatus for              
          detecting an image movement vector from an image signal pro-                
          duced by a video camera, the image movement vector represent-               
          ing movement of an object within an image represented by the                
          image signal, comprising:                                                   
                    vibration vector detecting means for detecting a                  
          vibration vector from the image signal resulting from vibra-                
          tion of the video camera; and                                               
                    image movement vector detecting means for detecting               
          an image movement vector representing movement of an object                 
          within an image represented by the image signal based on both               
          the image signal and the vibration vector.                                  


                    The Examiner relies on the following references:                  
          Murphy                           3,562,423       Feb.  9, 1971              
          Kanno et al (Kanno)              4,933,757       June 12, 1990              
          Kondo et al. (Kondo)             5,198,896       Mar. 30, 1993              
          Egusa et al. (Egusa)             5,237,405       Aug. 17, 1993              
          Miyatake et al. (Miyatake)       5,267,034       Nov. 30, 1993              
          (filed Feb. 25,                                                             
          1992)                                                                       


                    In the final rejection, the Examiner rejects claims               
          1 through 5, 7 and 14 through 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                   
          being anticipated by Kondo.  Also in the final rejection, the               
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007