Ex parte KITAHARA et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-2881                                                          
          Application No. 08/013,646                                                  


          support a rejection, whether or not in a minor capacity, there              
          would appear to be no excuse for not positively including the               
          reference in the statement of the rejection.  In re Hoch, 428               
          F.2d 1341, 1342, 166 USPQ 406, 407 (CCPA 1970).                             
                    Although Lee et al. was mentioned as teaching the                 
          claim language,                                                             
               ...and the rows of nozzle openings in an auxiliary                     
               scanning direction are staggered at a certain pitch                    
               so that an order of arrangement of the rows of                         
               nozzle openings is different from the physically                       
               arranged order,...(Emphasis added.)                                    
                                                                                     
          as discussed supra, this language recites no structural                     
          difference over the cited art (Usui and Mineta), but goes to                
          the functionality of the invention.  Therefore Lee et al. is                
          not needed for us to sustain the rejection of claim 1.  For                 
          this reason and those discussed supra, we will sustain the 35               
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 rejection of claim 1.                                                 
                    With regard to claim 2, Appellants argue that                     
          “neither Usui et al. nor Mineta teaches or suggests a                       
          recording head which includes a common reserve tank which is                
          common to two adjacent rows of nozzle openings.” (Brief at                  

                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007