Appeal No. 96-2894
Application 08/742,974
system is "selectively operable to search said network of
said servers for said server where said course resides,
operable to transfer said course from said server where said
course resides, and selectively operable to retrieve said
course from said repository if said course cannot be found
at said server."
However, claim 9's limitation "to deliver a course from
said at least one workstation to said repository" (emphasis
added) is not found in Andersen. Andersen delivers programs
from the central computer to the processor, not in the other
direction. We do not find where examiner addresses this
limitation. As appellants point out with respect to a
similar limitation in claim 1 (Br12): "Very clearly, the
segmented instructional program are [sic] transmitted from
the cluster sub-system to the requesting processor
stations." Since Andersen does not disclose delivering a
course from the processor to the central computer (which has
a repository), the anticipation rejection of claim 9 must be
reversed.
Claim 13
- 10 -
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007