THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KIM B. PEYTON and SOPHIA L. WANG ____________ Appeal No. 96-2898 Application No. 08/340,9981 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 18, 19, and 34-36. Claims 1 and 35 are representative and are reproduced below: 1. An additive composition for reducing the pour point and wax haze in a lubricating oil, said composition comprising 1Application for patent filed November 17, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007