Ex parte APPELQUIST et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3011                                                          
          Application No. 08/165,313                                                  


               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 14, which are all of the claims               
          pending in the application.                                                 


          Appellants’ invention is directed to an oil cooler for                      
          motor vehicles.  Independent claims 1 and 8 are representative              
          of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of those claims,                 
          reproduced from the Appendix to appellants’ brief, is attached              
          to this decision.                                                           


          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Burne et al. (Burne)     3,339,260                Sep.  5, 1967             
          Roberts                  3,664,928                May  23, 1972             

          Claims 1 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                    
          as being unpatentable over Burne in view of Roberts.                        


          Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement of                      
          the above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints                    
          advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding the                       
          rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007