Ex parte TATE et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 96-3032                                                          
          Application No. 08/321,392                                                  


               In view of the above, we will sustain the rejection of                 
          claims 2-4, 7, 10-12, 15, 18, 19 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          based on the combined teachings of Murray and Tannenbaum.                   
               In summary:                                                            
               The rejection of claims 2-4, 8, 10-12, 18 and 19 under 35              
          U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of Murray and                  
          Taylor is affirmed.                                                         
               The rejection of claims 2-4, 7, 10-12, 15, 18, 19 and 22               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of                    
          Murray and Tannenbaum is affirmed.                                          



















                                          16                                          





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007