THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD P. PALESTRO, DALE R. MORGAN,
MICHAEL D. ISEMAN and DONALD P. ROSIER
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3042
Application 08/293,1531
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-9, which are all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1994. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/087,178, filed July 2, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/960,085,
filed October 9, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007