Ex parte COLEMAN et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 96-3047                                                          
          Application 08/053,191                                                      


          prosecution before the Examiner unless, as a mere incident to               
          the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                
               If Appellants elect prosecution before the Examiner and                
          this does not result in allowance of the application,                       
          abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned                
          to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for final                  
          action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely request              
          for rehearing thereof.                                                      







               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                          AFFIRMED-IN-PART; 37 CFR 1.196(b)                           






                         JAMES D. THOMAS               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                        -14-                                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007