THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEITH HOLMES
____________
Appeal No. 96-3077
Application No. 08/255,5441
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-4, 6-12, 14-20, 22-27, and 29, all of the claims
pending in the present application.
The claimed invention relates to the passing of messages
between objects in an object oriented programming system.
1Application for patent filed June 6, 1994. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/717,450, filed June 19, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007