Appeal No. 96-3087 Application 08/059,060 values; and f) adjusting said surround-adjusted colorimetric values in accordance with the difference between the adaptive white point chromaticities specified for the input-image viewing environment and the encoded-image viewing environment to form intermediary color-image data encoding values; and g) forming at least one transform by relating said colorimetrically-specified test color values to said corresponding intermediary color-image data encoding values. The references relied on by the examiner are: Carlucci et al.(Carlucci) 5,191,645 March 2, 1993 Rolleston et al.(Rolleston) 5,305,119 April 19,1994 Claims 24 through 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 .2 As evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Carlucci and Rolleston [answer, page 2]. Reference is made to the appellants' brief and the examiner's answer for their respective positions. OPINION We have carefully considered the entire record before us, and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 24 through 46. 2The examiner has withdrawn the rejections of these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph [answer, page 2]. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007