Ex parte FISCHER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-3089                                                        
          Application No. 08/006,860                                                  
          to one or more leaf nodes, each path from the root node to any              
          leaf node of said three having an equal length where the                    
          length equals a number of nodes in a path;                                  
                         one or more keys having said information                     
          assigned thereto being stored on one or more of said nodes,                 
          each node having at most 2k+1 sons, where k is a natural                    
          number, each of said nodes, except said root node and said                  
          leaf nodes, having at least one son, and the root node being a              
          leaf node or having at least two sons; and                                  
                         wherein said leaf nodes of said tree comprise                
          additional pointers, said additional pointers pointing from                 
          one of said leaf nodes to another one of said leaf nodes, so                
          that a sequential search of leaf nodes may be performed                     
          without searching nodes other than leaf nodes.                              

                    The references relied on by the Examiner are as                   
          follows:                                                                    
          Bozman         5,089,952           Feb. 18, 1992                            
          Ferguson            5,121,493           Jun. 9, 1992 (filed Jan.            
          19, 1990)                                                                   

                    Claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 9 stand rejected                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bozman and                 
          Ferguson.                                                                   
                    Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or                 
          the Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer                 
          for the details thereof.                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
                    After a careful review of the evidence before us, we              
          agree with the Examiner that claims 1 through 5, 7 and 8 are                
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007