Ex parte POLETTO et al. - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 26                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte VANNI POLETTO                                 
                                  and MARCO MORELLI                                   
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-3113                                  
                              Application 08/099,2431                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and HECKER, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 13 through 21.  Claims 1 through 12 and 22 were                      
          indicated as allowed in the final rejection, Paper No. 10.                  


               Application for patent filed July 28, 1993.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007