Ex parte BOOS et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1996-3141                                                                              
            Application No. 08/415,766                                                                        


                                            Representative Claim                                              
            Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                 
                   1.     An internal surface reverse-phase packing material for liquid                       
                   chromatography, comprising a porous particle support having an outer                       
                   surface and an inner reverse-phase surface, wherein fatty acid residues are                
                   bonded through ester linkages to form said inner reverse-phase surface.                    
                                               The References                                                 
                   Horiuchi et al. (Horiuchi)             3,901,763    Aug.  26, 1975                         
                   Ayers et al. (Ayers)            4,330,440                May  18, 1982                     
                   Pinkerton et al. (Pinkerton)4,544,485        Oct.   01,  1985                              
                   Shibata et al. (Shibata)        5,041,226           Aug.  20, 1991                         
                   Haginaka et al. (Haginaka), “Internal-Surface Reversed-Phase Silica                        
                   Support for Direct Injection Determination of Drugs in Biological Fluids by                
                   Liquid Chromatography”, Anal.  Chem., Vol.  61, 1989, pages 2445-2448.                     
                   Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Kirk-Othmer), 3rd.                        
                   edition, Vol.  9, 1980, pages 291 and 300-302.                                             

                                                  The Issue                                                   
            The issue presented for review is whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 1                
            through 5 and 17 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Haginaka in view           
            of Pinkerton, Kirk-Othmer, Ayers, and either Shibata or Horiuchi.                                 








                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007