THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TERUO HIEDA, NOBUHIKO SHINODA
and KOJI TAKAHASHI
________________
Appeal No. 96-3189
Application 08/396,0791
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed February 28, 1995.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/271,558, filed July 7, 1994, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 08/158,159, filed
November 24, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 07/755,449, filed September 5, 1991, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007