Ex parte ZINS et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1996-3195                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/228,086                                                  

               27. An autoclavable fabric that is impervious to liquids,              
          the fabric comprising:                                                      
               a sheet of polyester fabric;                                           
               a layer of thermoplastic polyurethane; and                             
               a layer of thermosetting polyurethane, the                             
          thermosetting polyurethane layer being substantially less                   
          tacky than the thermoplastic polyurethane layer when                        
          autoclaved, the thermoplastic polyurethane layer being                      
          positioned between the fabric and the thermosetting                         
          polyurethane layer, thereby encapsulating the thermoplastic                 
          polyurethane layer and preventing the thermoplastic                         
          polyurethane layer from sticking to itself during autoclaving.              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Pounder et al. (Pounder)           3,483,073                Dec.            
          09, 1969                                                                    
          Kerr et al. (Kerr)            5,298,303                Mar. 29,             
          1994                                                                        
               Claims 1-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Kerr in view of Pounder.                                  
                                       OPINION                                        
               Upon careful consideration of the opposing arguments                   
          presented on appeal, we concur with appellants that the                     
          applied prior art fails to establish a prima facie case of                  
          obviousness of the claimed subject matter.  Accordingly, we                 
          will not sustain the examiner's rejection.                                  









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007