Appeal No. 96-3260 Page 7 Application No. 08/134,214 applied references do not suggest these limitations. We disagree. The examiner points to page 90 of Baumgarten, relating to “Completing the Block Operation,” and points out that there is a teaching therein that a “Sort” operation, as claimed, may be employed. Appellants argue, at page 9 of the brief, that “it appears that the sorting operation is not available with the block command” in Baumgarten. Such an argument is clearly misplaced in view of Baumgarten’s disclosure, at page 90, that the list of functions, including a “Sort” function, “work with the Block command.” Appellants then argue, at page 10 of the brief, that if Baumgarten does disclose a sorting operation that functions with the block command, “the sorting operations [sic, operation] does not function to sort the objects as a function of the position of each of the objects on a computer screen” [emphasis in the original]. However, we agree with the examiner that this limitation is recited so broadly as to include the alphanumerical sorting of Baumgarten. When two spaces are replaced by a single space or two hard returns are replaced by a single hard return in Baumgarten, the words, orPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007