Ex parte HUTCHENS et al. - Page 1




                                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                             

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                           
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 33                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                   Ex parte  DALE E. HUTCHENS                                                                                          
                                                                         and NORMAN COHEN                                                                                              
                                                                              _____________                                                                                            

                                                                           Appeal No. 1996-3292                                                                                        
                                                                         Application 07/991,4671                                                                                       
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before CALVERT, GARRIS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                 

                     CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             


                                                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                            

                                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 5, 7, 8 and 20, all the claims remaining in                                                    
                     the application.      2                                                                                                                                           

                                1Application for patent filed December 16, 1992.  According to appellants, this application is a                                                       
                     continuation-in-part of Application 07/827,171, filed January 29, 1992, now abandoned.                                                                            
                                2In an amendment after final rejection, claims 1, 5, 7, 8 and 20 were amended, and claims 6,                                                           
                     11 to 15 and 17 were cancelled.                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007