THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ANTOINE CORBIN, PHILLIPPE DEMONCY,
JACQUES FOULU and PIERRE SUDRAUD
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3293
Application 08/261,6451
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-22, 25-
1Application for patent filed June 17, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007