THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YOSHIHIKO AIHARA,
MASAYOSHI YAMAMICHI
and MASAHISA FUJINO
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3305
Application 07/607,1471
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 22 through 36.
1Application for patent filed October 31, 1990. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/471,034, filed January 26, 1990, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/267,655, filed November 3, 1988, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/012,862, filed February 10, 1987, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007