Ex parte BLOCH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3315                                                          
          Application 08/209,405                                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the refusal of the              
          examiner to allow claims 1, 2, 3 and 10 through 14 as amended               
          subsequent to the final rejection.  Claims 1, 2, 3 and 10                   
          through 14 are all of the claims remaining in the application.              
          Claims 4 through 9 have been canceled.                                      


                    Appellants’ invention relates to a pressure-sensi-                
          tive sealing tape having sufficient strength, stiffness and                 
          body to enable the tape, when in roll form, to be dispensed                 
          from a conventional pull and tear tape dispenser.  Independent              
          claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and               
          a copy of that claim may be found in the Appendix to appel-                 
          lants’ brief.                                                               


                    The prior art references of record relied upon by                 
          the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                          
          Hurst                            3,632,386       Jan.  4, 1972              
          Lutzmann et al. (Lutzmann)       4,096,013       June 20, 1978              
          Williams                         4,557,971       Dec. 10, 1985              
                                                                                     


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007