THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WEN-HANN WANG, KONRAD K. LAI,
GURBIR SINGH, MANDAR S. JOSHI,
NITIN V. SARANGDHAR and MATTHEW A. FISCH
__________
Appeal No. 96-3359
Application 08/204,5921
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KRASS, CARMICHAEL and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-5
and 17-26, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
Claim 1 reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed March 1, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007