THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEITH I. MULFORD,
THOMAS J. McCLAUGHRY,
and GARY W. PERSINOTTI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3366
Application 08/292,7001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-8, all the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed August 19, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation-in-part of Application 08/016,445, filed February 11, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007