THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERNST G. LESER and JAMES A. WINGRAVE
____________
Appeal No. 96-3426
Application No. 08/115,2741
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 4, 6
through 10 and 12 through 16, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application. An amendment filed concurrently
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007