THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT D. NASBY
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3444
Application No. 08/245,7851
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-21, which constitute all the claims pending in the
present application.
The disclosed invention relates to a semiconductor diode
switching device that, according to Appellant’s specification,
1Application for patent filed May 19, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007