Ex parte JUNIMAN - Page 3




                Appeal No. 96-3446                                                                                                        
                Application 08/327,147                                                                                                    


                invention, either explicitly or inherently."  In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429,                       

                1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997).  In the present case, the Bounous patent discloses a stocking having an opening                    

                at the lower end surrounded by a collar providing a "mock rib appearance".  The purpose of the                            

                opening is to allow inspection of the wearer's toes (col. 1, lines 36 to 50), and consequently the opening                

                is made to provide "sufficient stretch ... to permit the toe end of the stocking to be removed from the                   

                toes of the wearer so that the toes may pass through the opening for inspection purposes" (col. 3, lines                  

                63 to 67); this is shown in Fig. 6.                                                                                       

                        Appellant argues that Bounous does not meet the limitation of claims 1 and 6 that the collar                      

                provides an opening sufficient "to permit the entire foot of the wearer to pass through the opening".                     

                Since Bounous does not expressly disclose this limitation, it cannot anticipate claims 1 and 6 unless this                

                limitation is inherently disclosed.  The examiner asserts that it is, stating at pages 4 to 5 of the answer:              

                        It is inherent from the choice of yarns and the construction of the proposed                                      
                        modifications provided in columns 3 and 4 of Bounous et al., as discussed above, that                             
                        the opening would have had sufficient stretch provided to allow the entire foot of the                            
                        wearer to pass therethrough.                                                                                      

                Also, at pages 10 to 11:                                                                                                  

                        Bounous et al. discloses that the opening size may be made in looser or tighter                                   
                        configuration according to the end need.  This inherently allows the toe opening to be                            
                        made with sufficient stretch to fit over the entire foot.  The requirement of sufficient                          
                        stretch as claimed is understood to provide enough stretch to allow the foot to pass                              
                        through the hole without tearing the yarns around or within the hole.  This meaning                               
                        affords the hole of Bounous et al. to be constructed within the                                                   
                        disclosed method since the opening is positioned rearwardly of the toes (column 1, lines                          

                                                                    3                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007