Ex parte STILES - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 96-3501                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/172,773                                                                                                             


                 polyolefin foam pad.  Importantly, the pressure within the                                                                             
                 parison is raised and lowered to cause the parison and heat                                                                            
                 fusible surface of the foam pad to intermingle and fuse when                                                                           
                 “the pad and parison are made from the same material”                                                                                  
                 (specification, page 3, lines 14-16).  This is said to insure                                                                          
                 a secure attachment of the fuel tank to the heat shield                                                                                
                 (brief, page 2).                                                                                                                       
                          As evidence of obviousness of the claimed method, the                                                                         
                 examiner relies on the disclosures in Ohashi, Geise, and Ufer.                                                                         
                 That Ohashi discloses a method of making a plastic fuel tank                                                                           
                 substantially identical to that claimed with the exception of                                                                          
                 the pressure raising and lowering step is not disputed by                                                                              
                 appellant.   Appellant contends, however, that none of the2                                                                                                                    
                 references teach “increasing and decreasing the pressure                                                                               
                 within the parison to aid in intermingling the foam and                                                                                
                 parison interfacial surfaces (emphasis added).”  See the brief                                                                         
                 at page 4, lines 1-4.  Appellant acknowledges that Giese and                                                                           
                 Ufer teach pressure changes to promote fluorination of a blow                                                                          


                          2Appellant’s brief contains no specific arguments or                                                                          
                 analysis of Ohashi, nor any arguments that the references have                                                                         
                 been improperly combined.                                                                                                              
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007