THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID FARROW ____________ Appeal No. 1996-3536 Application No. 08/509,0061 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 17 and 21 through 23, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed July 31, 1995. According to the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/163,745, filed December 7, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007