THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN REXROAD and MERLE KINGHAM
____________
Appeal No. 96-3543
Application No. 08/153,6231
____________
HEARD: August 2, 1999
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-7, 9-12 and 14-16, which constitute
all of the claims remaining of record in the application.
1Application for patent filed November 17, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007